Cap the whole run, not only the model request
A small per-call token limit does not prevent a long sequence of calls, tool retries and queued work. Budget the complete task and define how it stops.
Read articleAI implementation, software architecture and cloud operations for teams worldwide.
146 articles in AI engineering
Page 7 of 9
A small per-call token limit does not prevent a long sequence of calls, tool retries and queued work. Budget the complete task and define how it stops.
Read articleAsking for approval after every small step creates queues and weak attention. Put review around meaningful commitments, with enough detail to understand the combined effect.
Read articleCheckpoints add storage and coordination, but restarting a long task can repeat model calls, document processing and operator effort. Compare the whole recovery path.
Read articleHuman judgement is most valuable where correctness is consequential or automation is uncertain. Use deterministic checks and targeted sampling to make that time count.
Read articleA cheaper response is not necessarily a cheaper completed task. Include rejected outputs, repeated calls and human recovery in the comparison.
Read articleExtraction charges are only part of document-processing cost. Include review time, false acceptance, duplicate work and the effort needed to maintain supplier formats.
Read articleRunning a model yourself can change control and cost, but it also creates responsibility for capacity, upgrades and recovery. Compare those obligations with the actual task workload.
Read articleAutomation cost includes the work handed back to staff. Measure whether an exception arrives with enough evidence to resolve it efficiently.
Read articleAbstention can prevent an incorrect answer, but it may create clarification and review work. Compare that effort with the consequence of answering incorrectly.
Read articleA retrieval review becomes more useful when the reviewer tries to cross a known boundary. Use a small, explainable exercise that reaches beyond the main search box.
Read articleSearch systems are good at finding something related. A useful review checks whether the application can recognise that the available sources do not answer the question.
Read articleA simple reading exercise reveals whether a retrieved passage carries enough context. Ask a reviewer to interpret it before showing the original page.
Read articleReview a citation feature by tracing a consequential sentence back to its evidence. A list of numbered links is only the beginning.
Read articleA freshness review should begin with information the product has already served. Old conversations expose assumptions that a clean search demo misses.
Read articleA prompt-injection detector is an additional signal. The application's access and execution rules should still hold when that signal is absent or wrong.
Read articleA typed tool can still expose too much authority. Compare every accepted field and side effect with the operation the user is actually permitted to request.
Read articleReview the values a person saw against the values the executor used. This catches hidden fields, stale state and post-approval changes that a polished screen can conceal.
Read articleA conversation can describe a completed action without proving its effect. Review the records and state transitions used to recover when messages and mutations diverge.
Read article